Homeland No license included -- gitHub Ruby-China

MasterD · 2011年12月17日 · 最后由 ashchan 回复于 2012年02月26日 · 3068 次阅读

What license is the code released under? I don't see anything in the readme, website, or source.


I guess this simply means there isn't any restrictions as the time of this writing. Personally I think we should include one (MIT or Ruby).

MIT prefer!

MIT 和 Ruby 的区别在哪里

@huacnlee MIT 可以把这里的代码用在私有软件中。私有软件的代码可以不开源。Ruby 类 GPL,只要用了 GPL 代码,你的代码也需要开源的。

The Ruby License is the open-source license applied to the Ruby programming language and also available to be used in other projects.

The Free Software Foundation comments: "This is a Free Software license, compatible with the GPL via an explicit dual-licensing clause." refs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_License

The MIT License is a free software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It is a permissive license, meaning that it permits reuse within proprietary software provided all copies of the licensed software include a copy of the MIT License terms. refs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

MIT 可以

Ruby 1.9.3 将改用 BSD 许可证发布. 2-clause BSD 许可证(大体上相当于 MIT 许可证)。


Matz 很后悔自己吃饱了撑的,为什么要去发明一个 Ruby 协议。^-^ 参见《松本行弘的程序世界》一书

@MasterD Just let you know we have MIT license added.

需要 登录 后方可回复, 如果你还没有账号请点击这里 注册