Ruby 又有 rubyist 吐槽 ruby 了:「Ruby is defined by terrible tools」

jcd · July 09, 2015 · Last by googya replied at July 09, 2015 · 2140 hits

伙伴们,去围攻他吧。

http://devblog.avdi.org/2015/07/08/ruby-is-defined-by-terrible-tools/

说 ruby 都无药可救了。

the Ruby ecosystem was shaped and molded by awful tooling. It still is. You can reject the language; embrace it anyway; or try and fix it. But to ignore this truth is to lose a vital element of context.

我们都来自这里:

And yet, in the early 2000s, long before Rails drove throngs of people to learn Ruby, very smart people who knew about Lisp and Haskell and good tooling, fell in love with Ruby. People like Dave Thomas and Martin Fowler and Jim Weirich.

And I did too, for reasons that still aren’t wholly clear to me.

Why do we love this language which is, in so many ways, the worst of many worlds? A Smalltalk without an image or browser; a Lisp without code-as-data; a Java without the static comprehensibility that automates refactorings; a Perl without… no, never mind, it’s still a better Perl than Perl.

慢慢看吧,不陪了

自己用着舒服就行,管别人怎么说

2 Floor has deleted

楼主完全没读懂文章的内容,断章取义

You need to Sign in before reply, if you don't have an account, please Sign up first.