https://ruby-china.org/ilessr en-us <p>就像 Matz 说的，现在处于静态类型的 hype 期。就连动态语言比如 PHP, Python, Javascript(TS) 都弄出了所谓静态检查。认为只有这样才能减少 bug. 今天看到篇文章对 Github 里面 repo 的各种语言 Bug 密度进行统计。结果发现并不是那么回事。静态类型被打脸。</p> <p>Round 1. Lang​​​​uages sorted by bug density. All repos </p> <p><img src="https://l.ruby-china.com/photo/2016/6e55311d80d39ba8266027394b0ae675.png!large" title="" alt=""></p> <p>Round 2. Language​s​​ sorted by bug density. More than 10 stars repos</p> <p><img src="https://l.ruby-china.com/photo/2016/ca2a60d9dbc1bce866b72c28ea447d6e.png!large" title="" alt=""></p> <p>Round 3. Languages sorte​d by bug density. More than 100 stars repos</p> <p><img src="https://l.ruby-china.com/photo/2016/5d8850b88856b055691a9ae982cf8626.png!large" title="" alt=""></p> <h4 id="看点:">看点：</h4> <ul> <li>Ruby 的 Bug 密度很小</li> <li>Erlang 的 Bug 密度也很小，跟 ruby 品味接近，怪不到吸引一批人去 Elixir.</li> <li>被某技术网红痛扁一通的 Go 和 Clojure 似乎挺好用</li> <li>作者忘了统计"最好的语言"</li> </ul> <p>原文链接：<a href="https://labs.ig.com/static-typing-promise" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://labs.ig.com/static-typing-promise</a></p> ilessr Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:36:19 +0800 https://ruby-china.org/topics/31816 https://ruby-china.org/topics/31816